This chapter contributes to the literature by empirically investigating certain important issues related to the activities and perception of entrepreneurship education :

Do the intentions and the perceptions in regard to being an entrepreneur differ between regions, or even between faculties?

Do regional differences in education structures affect different needs and preferences concerning content?

Which target groups perceive which activities as most important?

The aim is the understanding of the present state of entrepreneurship education and research and its future direction.

In general entrepreneurship education has the basic assumption that the competencies of an entrepreneur can be learned. This paper analyze 2 entrepreneurial programs (UK and Germany) and the effect of an “entrepreneurial climate and culture” on being entrepreneur.

It gives an example of entrepreneurial teaching program in an entrepreneurial University.

Academic entrepreneurship by means of university spin-offs commercializes technological breakthroughs, which may otherwise remain unexploited. However, many universities face difficulties in creating spin-offs. This article adopts a science-based design approach to connect scholarly research with the pragmatics of effectively creating university spin-offs. This approach serves to link the practice of university spin-off creation, via design principles, to the scholarly knowledge in this area. As such, science-based design promotes the interplay between emergent and deliberate design processes. This framework is used to develop a set of design principles that are practice based as well as grounded in the existing body of research on university spin-offs. A case study of spin-off creation at a Dutch university illustrates the interplay between initial processes characterized by emergent design and the subsequent process that was more deliberate in nature. This case study also suggests there are two fundamentally different phases in building capacity for university spin-off creation. First, an infrastructure for spin-off creation (including a collaborative network of investors, managers and advisors) is developed that then enables support activities to individual spin-off ventures. This study concludes that to build and increase capacity for creating spin-offs, universities should do the following: (1) create university-wide awareness of entrepreneurship opportunities, stimulate the development of entrepreneurial ideas, and subsequently screen entrepreneurs and ideas by programs targeted at students and academic staff; (2) support start-up teams in composing and learning the right mix of venturing skills and knowledge by providing access to advice, coaching, and training; (3) help starters in obtaining access to resources and developing their social capital by creating a collaborative network organization of investors, managers, and advisors; (4) set clear and supportive rules and procedures that regulate the university spin-off process, enhance fair treatment of involved parties, and separate spin-off processes from academic research and teaching; and (5) shape a university culture that reinforces academic entrepreneurship by creating norms and exemplars that motivate entrepreneurial behavior. These and other results of this study illustrate how science-based design can connect scholarly research to the pragmatics of actually creating spin-offs in academic institutions.

Analysis of university students in Canary Islands in relation with family enterprises aimed to generate strategies that allows a properly development of these high qualified people from the University.